Category: Headlines

  • Donald Trump’s Most Used Phrases: A Poem

    Donald Trump’s Most Used Phrases: A Poem

    I researched Donald Trump’s most used speech phrases thinking I’d somehow form them into a drinking game for the debates, but realized that was certainly asking to hospitalize everyone I knew from alcohol poisoning.

    So, instead, I offer you a poem where each line is an opt-used quote. It’s… something.

    Words. The very best words.

    Donald Trump in His Own Words

    Atlantic City
    A lot of money
    That I can tell you

    Just so you understand
    We’re going to
    Make America Great Again
    Going to build a wall

    And you know what?
    There’s something going on
    Thousands of people
    All over the place
    We have no idea who

    I called it

    By the way
    Crooked Hillary
    One of the worst
    Better than me?
    Excuse me?
    Give me a break

    Unbelievable.

    (Believe it)

     

     

  • Stop Calling Things the New Sexy

    Stop Calling Things the New Sexy

    Photo depositphotos

    I think when women say they feel sexy, what they really mean is they feel comfortable in their body. They feel wanted. They feel empowered. They feel sensual.

    Those are all great things to feel.

    To say something is sexy is a little bit different.

    And for the love of everything that’s holy, I need you to stop saying things are the new sexy.

    No really. I mean it.

    You know how Justin Timberlake brought sexy back?

    I love JT, and I love that song, but maaaan, I’d really like it if he’d take that shiz back where he found it.

     

    strong is not the new sexy

     

    You can’t escape seeing how things are the new sexy.

    Strong is the new sexy.

    Smart is the new sexy.

    Confident is the new sexy.

     

    Right. As though my primary concern in life is being sexy, and all other qualities become desirable only when it’s decided they can become elevated to “sexy.”

    Um, NO. Words matter. Distinctions matter.

    They matter in the way we judge ourselves and the message we impart to our daughters.

    There is a difference, and I’ll tell you what that difference is.

     

    By definition, sexy means attractive, appealing, arousing sexual desire or interest.

     

    Strong, smart, confident, generous, adventurous:

    these are states of being.

     

    You ARE strong if your body or spirit is capable of great burden.

    You ARE smart if you can decipher or analyze.

    You ARE confident if you believe in yourself, even when circumstance beckons you not to.

    These are qualities of being. They are ends in themselves.

    Be strong for the sake of being strong.

    Smart for the sake of being smart.

    Confident for the sake of confidence.

    Not because they make you sexy.

     

    Sexy is a state of appearing. It is a byproduct.

     

    Sexy is by definition a PERCEPTION of your physical and hormonal allure to another person.

    It is, and please excuse my language, a measure of how f*ckable you are.

     

    I don’t give a rat’s ass how f*ckable I appear to anyone.

     

    I want to BE strong. I want to BE smart. I want to BE confident and independent and courageous.

    In all things I strive to BE and not SEEM.

    You play a dangerous game when you confuse what you ARE and what you APPEAR TO BE.

     

    SO. Please.

    Aim to BE so many things.

    Just stop calling them the new sexy.

    That demeans them. And you.

     

     

    This post originally aired on HoneyBadgerMom.com and was dusted off after I was reminded of it after reading people’s comments on the magnificently strong and athletic bodies in ESPN’s Body Issue. Yes, we’re still airbrushing, we’re still portraying unattainable perfection (just of a different kind), we’re still putting too much emphasis on physicality, we’re still using skin to sell magazines… but the emphasis isn’t still squarely on sexy.

    ESPN can publish a nude photo series without resorting to sexy. Your move, every other magazine in existence.

     

  • We Make it Rain on These Bros

    We Make it Rain on These Bros

     

    woman on 10 dollar bill

    STOP THE PRESSES.

    THERE’S GONNA BE A WOMAN ON THE TEN DOLLAR BILL!

    Oh, happy day. OH, HAPPY DAY!

    There hasn’t been a woman on a piece of US paper currency in over 100 years, and we here at HBR are thrilled. THRILLED.

    Now, please understand us. We know that this isn’t going to guarantee us equal pay— and we too would much rather see women MAKE money. We know that this does not come with reproductive rights. We understand that this isn’t the cure to rape culture, or the disease that is domestic violence. We know that if anyone is deserving of the boot off their currency real estate, it’s Andrew Jackson, with his murdering, enslaving, genocidal ass. We will even allow that unless Jack Lew has been living under a rock, he knows it too.

    But dammit, we’re gonna have some representation! And it’s not a piece of currency like the coins that aren’t even recognizable as real or useful! They aren’t sticking us on something that’s been pretty much phased out! (Seriously, when was the last time you used a $2 bill? Exactly.)

    We’re going to be on the $10. And while it’s admittedly not the best choice, we’re only human, and we admit our instantaneous reactions overrode all logic when Jane told us this was happening:

    So this is actually happening!! Except that if we’re removing people from money, Jackson should really be getting the ouster: Woman to Appear on New $10 Bill

    Karrie Anne:   WHOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOO

    Jane:                Don’t get too excited— you just know it’s going to be some colonial white lady.

    Karrie Anne:   Deflate my bubble, JanieJane. Deflate my bubble. Can’t we have five seconds of nice things? GoT has ruined you.

    Jane:             Alexander Hamilton’s Descendant: I’ll ‘Do Everything’ to Keep Him on the $10 Bill

    Jane:                “Still, Hamilton said he recognizes the importance of having a woman grace one of the bills. Although he hadn’t thought about which woman might be a good fit, he suggested Alexander Hamilton’s wife, Elizabeth Schuyler Hamilton, for the work she did to preserve her husband’s legacy.” WTF SEXIST ASSHOLE.

    Karrie Anne:   Annnnnd here’s the dick. Right on cue.

    Jane:                It’ll be the 100th Anniversary of women getting the vote, so I’m going to go with Elizabeth Cady Stanton?

    Karrie Anne:   Ohhh, that’s a thought. Alice Paul?

    Jane:                Sojourner Truth was my other guess. It’ll have to be someone from pretty far back to avoid (more) controversy, is my suspicion

    Karrie Anne:   Hmmm, I see that. Either way, it won’t be anyone with a hint of controversy attached, like, say, Margaret Sanger.

    Jane:                Rachel Carson!

    Karrie Anne:   They’re not gonna go with a tree hugging hippie. I’ve got a better chance, lol

    Jane:                Better than a sex-crazed porn-spreader.

    Karrie Anne:   Well, when you put it like that…

    (Jane here: I need to point out that I was referring to Margaret Sanger, not Karrie Anne, when I mentioned “sex-crazed porn-spreader.”  Someone make sure her mother knows that.)

    There’s been a lot of talk about why replace Alexander Hamilton, the founder of the American banking system, and not someone a lot more shady, like Andrew Jackson.  (Aside from the aforementioned genocide, President Jackson was actually against the idea of a central bank and disliked paper currency.)  There was even a very successful online voting site, Women on 20’s,  devoted to the topic of replacing President Jackson with a woman.

    According to their website, the $10 bill is simply the next in line for redesign.  It was most recently changed in 2006, but was recommended for change ahead of the $20 bill to fight counterfeiting.  Over here at Honey Badger Revolution, we always believe the government, so there will be no talk of conspiracies. Because if anyone supports the recognition of the role women have played in American history, it’s our government.

    Weigh in with your candidate in the comments!

     

  • Non-Required Reading + Must See (Internet) TV: Helluva Week

    Non-Required Reading + Must See (Internet) TV: Helluva Week

    You weren’t planning on working today, were you?

    So, it was a hell of a week, you guys.

    • Gay marriage is just plain ol’ marriage now, all across the US of A. We wrote about it here and reacted in gifs here.
    • Supreme Court justices announced a 6-3 decision to preserve the Affordable Care Act.
    • Southern state governments are moving to take down the Confederate flag; Walmart, Target, Etsy, hell even NASCAR pledged to stop sporting it.
    • Since the South Carolina Statehouse was dragging its feet taking down the flag, badass Bree Newsome scaled that damn pole and took the flag down, easy peasy. Bitches get shit done.

    “We could not sit by and watch the victims of the Charleston Massacre be laid to rest while the inspiration for their deaths continue to fly above their caskets,” the activists said in a statement.

    11709454_1091037664242998_6424558908187048036_n

    New artwork, inspired by Bree Newsome. #FreeBreeStory here: http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/27/politics/south-carolina-confederate-flag/

    Posted by Gyno-Star on Facebook and you can buy the t-shirt here. Pass it on.

    Anyway, there are tons of posts that you could and should read about the last week. Read them to further your understanding of context. Find opposing views and seek to understand the lens through which they were written. I consider those required reading, which isn’t really what I was setting out to do in this post. I guess I’ll do a separate “Required Reading” roundup later this week, but for right now I just gotta share this post from the New Yorker that includes this quote from our President:

    “I have strengths and I have weaknesses, like every President, like every person, […] I am comfortable with complexity, and I think I’m pretty good at keeping my moral compass while recognizing that I am a product of original sin. And every morning and every night I’m taking measure of my actions against the options and possibilities available to me, understanding that there are going to be mistakes that I make and my team makes and that America makes; understanding that there are going to be limits to the good we can do and the bad that we can prevent […] but that, if I am doing my very best and basing my decisions on the core values and ideals that I was brought up with and that I think are pretty consistent with those of most Americans, that, at the end of the day, things will be better rather than worse.”

     

    OK, now on to the fun stuff.

    sleepingraptor

    Raptor Princesses. You can get them on a t-shirt, too.

    Why We Need Philosophers Engaged In Public Life. “Analyses of causal and moral responsibility crop up across philosophy — in metaphysics, ethics and legal philosophy, to name just a few. Philosophy is also a good place to look for critical arguments (as opposed to gut reactions) on issues like racism, eugenics and violence.”

    How Minecraft and Duct Tape Wallets Prepare Our Kids for Jobs That Don’t Exist Yet. Really interesting, and helps ease my guilt about too much Minecraft time.

    Here’s a new theme song for ya.


     

    Agency Says Whole Foods Overcharges. Um, duh?

    Fight Club for Kids. Because so much yes and Chuck is frankly adorable.

    What if We Treated Other Consent Situations Like Society Treats Sexual Consent? Brilliantly simple.

    Amy Winehouse, Kurt Cobain and the Gendering of Martyrdom. “The way media dotes over its tortured male artists while undermining the personal struggles of women who suffer the same is nuanced, but a look into the archive suggests the phenomenon is well documented across race, genre, and generation.”

    Meet Abandoned Blind Dog and His Trusty Canine Guide Who ‘Acts as His Eyes’


    ABC US News | World News

     

    Hey, here’s another t-shirt you need. Maybe I need to start a new series dedicated to must have shirts.

    Poehler-Fey-2016

    Here’s another Poehler beauty: a segment of “REALLY?!” with Seth Meyers calling out a Sports Illustrated contributor who tweeted that nothing about women’s sports is worth watching. Oh, really.

    We Tried On Victoria’s Secret Bathing Suits And This Is What Happened. These body positive posts are everywhere now, and really that’s a good thing. I liked this one a lot.

    Start Your Morning Right With an Alarm Clock That Makes You Coffee. In my house, this is called “my kids” but whatever. We’re ready to test it. For science.

    Utah Valley U. Paints ‘Texting’ Lane on Busy Staircase

    Antwerp now has ‘text lanes’ for pedestrians who are glued to their mobile phones

    Are all these texters in their own lanes just bumping into each other, like human bumper cars? Where the hell is the live video feed?

    I’ve watched this like a dozen times and it never stops being funny.

    Getting drunk on your own front porch is not illegal, rules US court. “Judges in Iowa feared that convicting a woman for ‘public intoxication’ on her front steps would risk making JD barbecue sauce potentially illegal.”

    Related: map of the drunkest states during the summer.

    *whispers* I know it’s cool to hate on Buzzfeed but I really, really love the Try Guys.

    And finally: this week, when that special someone is on your last nerve, take a deep breath and calmly invite them to shoot a rainbow outta their blowhole.

     

    HIT ME UP.
    Share your links for me to read— required or no— along with any must-see videos.

     

  • Taste the Rainbow, Cause Marriage is For Everyone

    Taste the Rainbow, Cause Marriage is For Everyone

    d2c5f32631fcb6a94dfeebb209988db29ef0156386a6cc1419ab4b87056daa68I am a heterosexual, Christian, single woman. And I am here to CELEBRATE THE SHIT OUT OF THE  SCOTUS RULING.

    GAY MARRIAGE IS LEGAL, BITCHES! WHOOOOO!

    I am no one’s theologian, but let’s be clear. The SCOTUS ruling has not re-defined marriage, invalidated marriage, destroyed marriage, blah blah fucking blah.

    Two people getting married should have no impact on your own marriage, unless, of course, you are already married to one of those two people, and you’re not Mormon. If your marriage is so weak that two men or two women getting married can destroy it, you need to take another look at what is going on in your house.

    If your faith is so screwed up, you’d rather kill yourself, or completely uproot your life than see gay marriage be legal, or if your faith is God is so skewed that you spend more energy fighting against gay marriage (we can just call it marriage now!) than you do doing the things Jesus actually talked about, you are missing the point of being like Jesus.

    You know what Jesus and the architects of the New Testament talk about? Helping the poor and disenfranchised.  Engaging the marginalized. Protecting the weak. You’re supposed to be concerned about things like fighting for the rights of the widows and orphans and those who are victims of violence and poor prison conditions. 

    If you call yourself a Christian, and vote for politicians who want to de-fund SNAP, you are not following Jesus.  Where does Jesus talk about taking food FROM people in need?

    If you call yourself a Christian and you vote for politicians who want to repeal the ACA, you are not following Jesus.  Seriously, I think the Man that raised Lazarus from the dead, gave sight to the blind, healed a leper, and cured the woman with the issue of blood, and all other manner of illness is okay with healthcare for all.

    If you call yourself a Christian and vote to disenfranchise a group of people on the basis of something that Jesus did not expressly discuss, you need to do some serious re-evaluating.  You want to ignore ALL OF THE SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS and hang your hat on some shit He didn’t even talk about? GTFOH with that twisted religion- sanctioned bigotry.

    “Before you speak to me about your religion, first show it to me in how you treat other people; before you tell me how much you love your God, show me in how much you love all His children; before you preach to me of your passion for your faith, teach me about it through your compassion for your neighbors. In the end, I’m not as interested in what you have to tell or sell as in how you choose to live and give.” Senator Cory Booker

    If you honestly believe homosexuality is the sin to end all sins, (as opposed to, you know, murder, theft, turning your back on the poor, adultery) then you need to have a little talk with Jesus. And read your Bible.

    If I get married tomorrow, do you know what will happen? I’ll get some tax breaks. I may or may not change my last name (more trouble than it’s worth, honestly) I’ll get ‘next of kin’ privileges if my husband ends up in the hospital, and all manner of other perks and goodies, like being a beneficiary on any death benefits as the surviving spouse.

    And isn’t that all a marriage is as far as the government is concerned?

    You know what changes about my marriage now that with “gay” marriage is legal?

    Nothing. None of that changes for me if two men or two women get married.

    A religion’s definition of marriage is very different from the governments- and since we’re all about the separation of church and state thing, that’s wonderful news. The IRS doesn’t ask about the religion of my household when I file jointly. My tax bracket doesn’t change if I check Christian. No one on a state and federal level gives a rat’s ass if I was married in a church, the justice of the peace, the Home Depot, or while sitting in a tree.

    A marriage is a contract that indicates to the government that you and this other person will be doing shit together from here on out.

    And that’s okay.

    Different religions put different spins and meanings on marriage, and call marriage a weighty matter in the eyes of their deity.

    And that’s okay too. It is a weighty matter. Religion or not, it is not a contract to be entered into lightly.

    But your religion does not, cannot, define marriage for the country. Think about this argument. If marriage is only marriage because your religion says it is, does your religion then invalidate all of the marriages that began under a religion different than yours? Does your religion invalidate all of the marriages of those heterosexual couples who don’t believe in any brand of theism? If that’s the case, then there can be NO marriages in the United States- every religion invalidates the one before.

    Marriage is in your heart. Not in your religious affiliation.  Sorry, religious zealots, your argument is invalid.

    If I get married tomorrow, it will be by a pastor. It will be in a church. And Jesus will not bless my union any less because a gay couple is getting married next week. My relationship with God is not defined by anything else anyone else does.

    Why should this be?

    “No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were.

    As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law.

    The Constitution grants them that right. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.  It is so ordered” – Justice Kennedy